Bitscape's Lounge

Powered by:

Urban Survival 102 - Level Up

Started: Tuesday, November 1, 2005 14:15

Finished: Tuesday, November 1, 2005 14:57

It has been my observation that one can learn and notice much more about one's environment when riding a bike than by zooming past everything in a car. Likewise, going on foot, one can find and discover even more than someone zipping by on a bike. There is a reverse correlation between speed and the granularity of perceptual experience.

Applying this maxim further, we could say that by sitting still in one place, one could get an even clearer perception of the immediate reality of it than by walking through.

And so it was that I found myself on this warm clear November afternoon, walking rather than riding to the nearby Herbert Park, a locale through which I route my bike rides on a fairly consistent basis, both because of the efficiency of the route, and because it provides pleasant and peaceful surroundings during the journey.

But today, I stopped and sat on one of the benches. Just sat, soaking in the sun, watching the leaves fall from the trees, feeling the gentle breeze brush the surface of the land, observing the children go by on their way to the playground.

A cluster of evergreen trees at the edge of the park beckoned me. After a time, I walked over and sat amidst them, in a semi-meditative posture, though I was not attempting to practice any formal or focused form of meditative mind.

I looked at the ground, and the trees; the pinecones, and the bark. Inspired by the writings of Tom Brown Jr, and also thinking about some stuff I had read regarding the culturally imposed limits on what is considered "food", and how such psychological barriers were strong enough to cause entire groups of settlers to starve even while the natives thrived in plain sight, I picked up one of the pinecones, and began to chew on one of the kernels.

A question lurking at the back of my mind. It was as if I was asking the Goddess of Earth, "If I needed it, could you feed me?"

I was not truly hungry, though I had thought it might be a good idea to eat something other than more of the bean dip I made yesterday. Obviously, I was not hungry enough, as the hard bark of these pinecones tasted about as good as picking up a clod of dirt to eat. I gave up on that little musing, and continued to soak in the beauty of the place.

But as I continued to sit, the Goddess gave me an answer. On the ground, camouflaged amidst the landscaped bits of dead wood that covered the ground, I noticed some little brown shoots poking up through the debris. Mushrooms. Tiny little mushrooms.

Generally speaking, I am anything but a fan of mushrooms, at least in the form that they generally appear in our food. Slimey, gooey icky things. I avoid them in my cuisine whenever I have a choice.

But these... Well, they were wild, and this was one of my lessons. I knew that. I also knew that as someone with virtually no knowledge or training in edible species, I would be taking a risk. What if it was a poisonous species? But my instinct told me it was okay. If I was wrong, I would only have eaten a tiny bit, and like the day of my first dumpster dive, I was willing to take the negligable risk of a visit to the emergency room for the hope that I might learn something and cross another landmark.

I ate several of the tiny little things, and they actually tasted quite good. Not mushy at all.

It may not be much, but even in the park in the middle of a city, there was something growing out of the ground fit for human consumption. Maybe in the event of a Hard Crash, I might have some tiny chance after all. Or even if I don't, or even if there is no crash, I've learned something new today.

Thank you, Goddess.

Now, on to work with me!

Lincoln Parks
by bouncing (2005-11-01 21:37)

It's worth checking if Lincoln sprays their parks with poison in the hopes of decreasing the insect population. You could be eating those poisons.

Possible poisons
by Bitscape (2005-11-01 22:32)

Yeah, that is a possiblity. The area I went to looked pretty much out of the mainstay (i.e. outside the main grassy area), so it seems less likely, but still worth considering.

(That's the main reason it's generally a bad idea to eat dandylions from residential lawns. The plant itself is very edible, but the chemicals that our destructive culture tells people to put in the ground and on the plants aren't.)

Poison free results
by Linknoid (2005-11-02 05:58)

It was quite shocking to see the difference when I came to a place where no insectacide had been applied. The house my uncle bought and has been fixing up is in more of the run down part of town, with really old houses. My grandma took me to see it, and when we stepped out of the car, there were swarms, just hundreds and hundreds of all kinds of different bugs, most the size of a mosquito or less (if you were starving, they wouldn't be much of a food source, unless you're the size of a bat).

Then it hit me, this is what it's like when they don't spray for insects. This is what all the lawns in Lincoln would be like if it weren't for insect spray. While I'm pretty opposed to spraying poisons into the environment to target any kind of life, I found it rather trying to stand in the midst of all those insects. Maybe I'd just have to get used to it, but my few minutes of exposure left me rather less well disposed to insect kind.

The problem
by Bitscape (2005-11-02 09:11)

The problem with such poisons is that in most cases, they aren't just harmful to insects, but to humans (and probably animals) as well. Of course, the impact on bugs is far more severe (death) because of their small relative size, but they can also have less immediately obvious adverse effects on people too. Also, some people are more sensitive than others.

First-hand example: When I was a kid, the apartments our family was living in were beset by a seiges of little ants, so the management decided to have them sprayed with insecticides. It got rid of the ants alright, but it also caused my mom to get sick and suffer convulsions. The solution proved to be worse than the problem (for our family, at least).

It might also be worth asking what's attracting all those insects? Maybe in some areas, they are a natural part of the eco-system, but I bet that's not always the case. For example, last summer, I would often stop outside to read. Whenever I sat on a bench in one of the city parks, I was constantly being bothered by flies (in addition to buzzing around like a nuisance, they also had a rather nasty habit of biting). But when I tried some of the country trails immediately outside Lincoln (where pesticides are much less likely to be sprayed), I could sit on the ground beside the trail for hours and saw hardly any flies at all. (I did see a couple of rather large looking spiders crawl by, but they left me alone in peace.) I made the guess that the flies in the park were probably thriving off the human garbage in the trash containers. If my guess is true, then people (or the specific ways people choose to live) are responsible for the plague of flies.

Since I am not a biologist or an ecologist, and I don't know the specifics of your uncle's area, I can't speak about the cause of the bugs there. But I also wouldn't jump to the conclusion that just because there are a lot of insects somewhere that annoy us, we should immediately start spraying. Maybe there's another solution.

Bug spray
by Linknoid (2005-11-02 18:49)

I had very serious problems when I was at Union because of the spraying for insects over winter break, they didn't let the air circulate, and I got very, well, a kind of sick. I lost most of my balance and had headaches for several weeks after I got back. I spent most of that time sitting down, moving around as little as possible because I just plain didn't have any balance. That was really bad.

However, it's quite possible that the swarms of tiny bugs I experienced were the result of some other attribute of the area, and not naturally caused simply by not spraying.

Boulder Parks
by bouncing (2005-11-02 10:59)

It could be a difference in climate, but I know Boulder never sprayed for insects until West Nile forced them to, and insects were never really much more than an infrequent annoyance here. (I don't think they've sprayed since, either.)

There are also healthier ways to deal with insects. They have natural predators, like birds and bats. Many species of bird are vulnerable to the same poisons insects are, so when you spay for insects, you also wipe out their natural predators.

For that matter, when I was on a trip to New Orleans (pre-Katrina), the giant bug spray vehicles rolled by in the muggy night air, and I thought about how miserable it would be if they weren't there.

Lincoln Bug Spraying
by Yanthor (2005-11-03 09:38)

To my knowledge, the only times Lincoln has sprayed for bugs is because of West Nile, and it was specifically anti-mosquito poison sprayed on some, not all sections of the city. I think they do that at least once a year. (I read about it in the local paper.)