Bitscape's Lounge

Powered by:

Court rules that The Matrix was plagiarized (News)

Monday, March 21, 2005 15:46

Sophia Stewart has won her case.

According to court documentation, an FBI investigation discovered that more than thirty minutes had been edited from the original film, in an attempt to avoid penalties for copyright infringement. The investigation also stated that "credible witnesses employed at Warner Brothers came forward, claiming that the executives and lawyers had full knowledge that the work in question did not belong to the Wachowski Brothers." These witnesses claimed to have seen Stewart's original work and that it had been often used during preparation of the motion pictures.

Most telling is the lack of press coverage. A search for "Sophia Stewart" on google shows up NOTHING right now. A search for "Matrix" contains no relevant results. Yet more evidence of the degree of Soviet-style control over the national media, even in the entertainment press.

Correction: She may or may not have actually won the case yet. The article is worded in a confusing manner, but it says her charges were "were received and acknowledged by the Central District of California", which doesn't necessarily indicate a victory. Also, it indicates that this occurred on October of last year. Other sites that follow the issue have made no mention of a ruling in the case, so the headline may be bogus. But my comments on lack of mainsteam media coverage of the case still stand.

Bah
by Zan Lynx (2005-03-23 21:25)

It happened last year, the case hasn't been resolved. What's news? I think it's more likely that Sophia is just going for a chunk of the money.

It's not Soviet style control if the news doesn't report on what isn't news.

Besides, there seems to be plenty of talking about it on the Internet, easily findable by Google and I didn't find any reports about anyone getting their door kicked in.

Unless Google is part of the conspiracy too! Well, someone should go to California and get the court records, and if they disappear we'll know there's real Soviet style control going on.

Maybe her story was similar. Does she think she's the first person to write about reality being a computer simulation? Not hardly.

Now, if they really did use her story while writing the Matrix then it is copyright infringement and plagarism. If they just used similar themes, she's got no case.

What would really be fitting in my opinion is if she *does* win, science fiction authors from around the world should sue HER since she obviously stole their ideas.

Yeah, I don't have the facts, but I've got an opinion! :-)

If I wanted the facts, I'd have to dig up the court records, which should be public, and find out for real. Hardly anybody does that though, it's easier to just have an opinion.

The truth? No one bothers with the truth, it's too much work to find out.